This is the embedded HTML code for FedCURE's "BARBER AMENDMENT" campaign on CHANGE.org.
Copy and paste into your website pages to display FedCURE's "Call~2~Action" wizard banner
to support the BARBER AMENDMENT Petition on CHANGE.org, as shown above.

COPY LINE OF CODE BELOW:

script src="https://d18kwxxua7ik1y.cloudfront.net/product/embeds/v1/change-embeds.js" type="text/javascript"></script><div class="change-embed-petition" data-petition-id="20558

~~~~~~~

 

Many thanks to the tens of thousands of American's who supported H.R. 1475 in the 111th Congress and The BARBER AMENDMENT Petition in the 112-119th Congress.  Although the bill did not pass and BARBER not introduced, it is not the last hurrah for federal good time legislation. Please continue to contact your Congresspersons urging them to sponsor FedCURE's proposals in 119th Congress. 

BARBER AMENDMENT:  A bill to amend Title 18 U.S.C. Section 3624(b)(1) as follows:  by striking the number "54" in the first sentence as it appears and inserting in lieu thereof the number "128"; and in the same sentence, by striking "prisoner's term of imprisonment"  and inserting in lieu thereof  "sentence imposed." This amendment is retroactive. [END].

 

Note:   The BARBER AMENDMENT has not been introduced.  FedCURE is seeking bipartisan support for the bill in the 119th Congress.

---

SECOND LOOK:  Introducing The Sentencing Reform Act ~ (best practices, evidence based legislation to establish a retroactive, hybrid system of parole and good time allowances; retroactive 1-1 ratio for crack cocaine penalties and retroactive repeal of mandatory minimum sentences, for most federal offenders; and provide reentry opportunities for people coming home from prison).

 

FedCURE NEWS Special Video Presentation:  http://www.fedcure.org/SecondLook.shtml. 

 

Note:   The Sentencing Reform Act has not been introduced.  FedCURE is seeking bipartisan support for the bill in the 119th Congress. 

---

---

---

 

FedCURE's Federal Good Time Bill Campaign: "Top 10 Ideas for Change in America"

 

~ 119th Congress ~

 

National Call - to - Action ~ BARBER Amendment ~ Federal Good Time Bill  

 

 

Ninety Percent (92%) Public Support

The BARBER AMENDMENT - An Annual $1.2 Billion Austerity Sentencing Bill.

 

Come on everyone!  Pitch in and contact the 119th Congress.  We can do it!

 

 

Sponsor The BARBER AMENDMENT - Good Time Bill | Sign the Petition!

Sign the petition on FedCURE/CHANGE.org:  http://tinyurl.com/nry98ja

---

CONTACT CONGRESS to amend H.R. 5682 ~ Fair Sentencing Act (FSA) to urge Congress to include the BARBER AMENDMENT in the FSA. To wit:

BARBER AMENDMENT: A bill to amend Title 18 U.S.C. Section 3624(b)(1) as follows: by striking the number "54" in the first sentence as it appears and inserting in lieu thereof the number "128"; and in the same sentence, by striking "prisoner's term of imprisonment" and inserting in lieu thereof "sentence imposed." This amendment is retroactive. [END].

Hi!  Thank you for coming & helping to reach out to the 119th Congress. Here are your campaign tools: First, sign the petition on this page and forward to your friends. Then start calling the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121.  The Switchboard can direct you to your Congressional Representative and Senators.  Once you reach the office, you can use the talking points below or share your own story. Finally, and most important, click on the "Contact Congress Now!" button, below, to send your message to your Congresspersons.

 

MESSAGE:

Dear Members of the 119th Congress of the United States,
 

Subject: The BARBER AMENDMENT - Increased Good Time Allowances.

 

I am asking you to please support The BARBER AMENDMENT, which would amend Title 18 U.S.C. Section 3624(b)(1) as follows: by striking the number "54" in the first sentence as it appears and inserting in lieu thereof the number "128"; and in the same sentence, by striking "prisoner's term of imprisonment" and inserting in lieu thereof "sentence imposed."  This Amendment is retroactive. [END].

 

SECOND LOOK: The Federal Bureau of Prisons is running at 38% over operating capacity.  In October 2012 the GAO's David C. Maurer reported, on GAO 12-743, that a 10% reduction in the federal prison population would save $660 million a year - FedCURE estimates the number is over $1.2 billion dollars a year. Maurer also reported that home confinement would be half the cost of incarceration or half way house (RRC). See the video [19:04-19:52] here: http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/25878123 The President's Budget for FY 2012 and 2013, included 48 to 58 million dollars (respectively) in offsets for a proposed legislative initiative that would have allowed 54 days Good Conduct Time for inmates, as well as for general administrative efficiencies.  Neither proposal was passed by Congress.

What is more, however, is an historic, groundbreaking 2013 report, from the 'Congressional Research Service' (CRS) */ titled, "The Federal Prison Population Buildup: Overview, Policy Changes, Issues, and Options" thoroughly documents the United States' "historically unprecedented 790% increase in the federal prison population." The Report supports the long held view by many, including FedCURE, its members, partners, fellow advocate organizations, former and current members of Congress, judges, high level government officials, the nations most respected, independent nonpartisan think tanks, prominent scholars, criminal justice professionals and an overwhelming majority of the public, that Congress cannot build its way out of the mass incarceration dilemma it now faces, because of a failed criminal justice policy; and recommends Congress "changing or reversing some of the policies that have been put into place over the years which contributed to the increasing number of federal prison inmates," inter alia, increasing good time and reinstating parole.  The BARBER AMENDMENT , a simple two sentence undisruptive statutory amendment, genuinely accomplishes these ends, with out disrupting release or reentry processes and public safety, by restoring--rolling back--federal good time allowances to pre-1987 levels. Virtually, BARBER is a "Relief Valve" and $1.2 billion dollar annual austerity sentencing bill. BARBER does not reduce the bureau's budget, but redirects $1.2 billion dollars from incarceration to reentry, e.g., housing and employment.

 

While elaborating on "several options Congress could consider if policymakers wanted to expand early release options for federal inmates, including (1) reinstating parole, (2) expanding good time credits, and (3) expanding the conditions under which courts could reduce sentences pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3582(c)(1)(A)," it is abundantly clear that the report concludes, inter alia, that the way out of the dilemma--to reduce the growth of the federal prison population--is for Congress to employ "Early Release Measures." These measures include "(1) modifying mandatory minimum penalties, (2) expanding the use of Residential Reentry Centers, (3) placing more offenders on probation, (4) reinstating parole for federal inmates, (5) expanding the amount of good time credit an inmate can earn, and (6) repealing federal criminal statutes for some offenses." BRAVO!

 

Moreover, according to the report and righteously so, "Congress might also consider changing or reversing some of the policies that have been put into place over the years which contributed to the increasing number of federal prison inmates. Some of these options include placing some inmates in alternatives to incarceration, such as probation, or expanding early release options by allowing inmates to earn more good time credit or allowing inmates to be placed on parole once again. Congress could consider reducing the amount of time inmates are incarcerated in federal prisons by limiting the number of crimes subject to mandatory minimum penalties or reducing the length of the mandatory minimum sentence. Finally, policymakers could consider allowing states to investigate and prosecute offenses that have become subject to federal jurisdiction over the past three decades" Id., at p. 57.

 

Full Report, 60 pg. PDF (indexed to highlighted sections) available at: http://www.fedcure.org/documents/CRS_FederalPrisonPopulationBuildup_R42937-220113fc.pdf

---

* Note: Special thanks to Nathan James, Analyst in Crime Policy, CRS, njames@crs.loc.gov, for this report. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is an arm of the Library of Congress devoted to providing for Congress research and analysis on legislative issues. In addition to meeting with Congressional members and staffers, CRS releases reports and issue briefs for members of Congress. These reports and issue briefs are made available to Congress through a web site that is not available to the general public. The CRS strongly believes that its sole purpose is to directly serve Congress and not the public. https://opencrs.com/faq/

---

Bipartisan Support: Republican's (www.RightOnCrime.com) and Democrat's ( http://www.besmartoncrime.org) and members of Congress agree that the current prison system is way so ineffective and that we have been wrong on crime for the past 28 years. It has been a escalating burden on taxpayers who are footing the bill for more prisons. The penal model enacted by Public Law 98-473 (Sentencing Reform Act of 1984) of "incapacitation" in lieu of "rehabilitation and reentry" has failed miserably. We can and must do better.

Our economic crisis is due in part to the state of our judicial system where so many first time non violent offenders are given Draconian sentences and no means to redeem themselves. Once in the prison system, they have no reason to desire rehabilitation or work towards early release.

Americans want to see results, not stiffer sentences. We can change they way the judicial system enforces punishment and how inmates serve their time in a way that would benefit both the inmate and society. The BARBER AMENDMENT would benefit the following:

* The BARBER AMENDMENT allows the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to maintain correctional worker staffing and help relieve overcrowding of prisons.

* The Federal Bureau of Prisons has a budget that exceeds $6.8 billion dollars a year. After the FBI, the BOP has the largest budget of any unit in the Department of Justice.

* The BARBER AMENDMENT saves taxpayers $1.2 billion dollars per year on incarceration cost, that can be redirected to reentry.

* Releasing 10% of the federal prison population will not disrupt existing Federal Bureau of Prisons policy and procedures and public safety; and GAO says saves $660 million a year.

* The BARBER AMENDMENT - Good Time Allowances rewards those inmates who have shown positive behavior.

* Although early release would not be guaranteed, it would allow a Second Chance to those who prove they are deserving of it.

* The cost to house an inmate for 12 months is almost $30,000.00. Costs rise significantly for all inmates over age 60 and nearly double or quadruple for inmates with medical issues.

* People in prison do not receive the same health care as free people and lengthy non-parolable sentences cause medical emergencies for those in facilities; and huge indigent health care costs upon release.

* The Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBOP) is the largest police force in the United States, more then 38,000 employees. The AFGE.org, the FBOP's labor union, is battling on the Hill to add 15,000 correctional officers because of safety concerns due to overcrowding and budget cuts. Both Republicans and Democrats agree that building additional bed space in prisons will not resolve the systemic issues of the prison system. We can not build our way out of this.

* The BOP has been triple bunking because of lack of bed space, which heightens tensions and makes it more dangerous for both staff and inmates.

Federal Sentencing data collected, post Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (over 29 years) provides the gold standard of evidence on what works and what does not; and when is the proper time to release an offender from a sentence while posing no risk to public safety. I would also direct you to these facts: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=164544453571541

 

The government's experts on these issues all support reforms, such as early release, via increased good time allowances and reinstating parole, as evidenced in the CRS Report, supra, and further, by the distinguished panels sitting on FedCURE NEWS Presentation Second Look.  Please take the time to watch U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer (Video #1), U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder (Video #2) and most of all, Patricia Cushwa, Commissioner of the United States Parole Commission (Video #11) and Harley G. Lappin, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (Video #8).  I would be remiss, however, if I did not strongly urge you to view all of the video's on "Panel Four, titled: Good Time, Community Corrections and Re-Entry." See the exclusive videos here:http://www.fedcure.org/SecondLook.shtml

 

Institution Crowding:

This chart shows federal inmate cells at normal rated capacity versus overcrowded conditions at low, medium and high security facilities.  Despite a ten year build out, increased double bunking and triple bunking, since 2003, the overcrowding rate hovers at 38%.  The federal prison population was 165,000 in January 2003.  April 2013, it was 218,500.  Proof, the bureau cannot build its way out of crowding.

Testimony of Director, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., to House Appropriations, Subcommittee, 17 April 2013:.

[Quote] The BOP confines over 176,000 inmates in Bureau-operated facilities, which have a total rated capacity of just under 129,000 beds. Crowding is of special concern at higher security facilities, including penitentiaries (operating at 54 percent over capacity) and medium security institutions (operating at 44 percent over capacity). These facilities confine a higher number of inmates who are prone to violence than lower security facilities. The BOP has managed overcrowding by double and triple bunking inmates throughout the system, or housing them in space not originally designed for inmate housing, such as television rooms, open bays, program space, etc.

In addition to double and triple bunking, to manage crowding, we have improved the architectural design of our newer facilities and have taken advantage of improved technologies in security measures such as perimeter security systems, surveillance cameras, and equipment to monitor communications. These technologies support BOP employee's. ability to provide inmates the supervision they need in order to maintain security and safety in our institutions. We have also enhanced population management and inmate supervision strategies in areas such as classification and designation, intelligence gathering, gang management, use of preemptive lockdowns, and controlled movement. While we continue to look for ways to address crowding in our facilities, the challenges continue as we face continued growth in the inmate population.

The BOP performed a rigorous analysis of the effects of crowding and staffing on inmate rates of violence, and found a direct relationship between crowding, staffing, and institution safety. Data was used from all low, medium, and high security BOP facilities for male inmates for the period July 1996 through December 2004. We accounted for a variety of factors known to influence the rate of violence and, in this way, were able to isolate and review the impact that crowding and the inmate-to-staff ratio had on serious assaults. This study found that increases in both the inmate-to-staff ratio and the rate of crowding at an institution (the number of inmates relative to the institution's rated capacity) are related to increases in the rate of serious inmate assaults. An increase of one in an institution's inmate-to-custody-staff ratio increases the prison's annual serious assault rate by approximately 4.5 per 5,000 inmates.

The BOP employs many management interventions in an attempt to prevent and suppress inmate violence. These interventions are resource-intensive and include: paying overtime to increase the number of custody staff available to perform security duties, utilizing staff from program areas (detracting from inmate programs and other vital institution functions), locking down an institution after a serious incident and performing intensive interviews to identify perpetrators and causal factors, performing comprehensive searches to eliminate weapons and other dangerous contraband, and designating and housing inmates in Special Management Units (SMU). SMU inmates consist of sentenced offenders who participated in or had a leadership role in geographical group/gang-related activity, or those who have a history of disruptive, disciplinary and/or misconduct infractions. The BOP designates inmates to SMUs because greater management of their interaction is necessary to ensure the safety, security, and orderly operation of BOP facilities, and protection of the public. SMU inmates require a more restrictive confinement than general population inmates. The BOP currently has three SMU locations. [End Quote].

Sadly, while the bureau and DOJ argue for relief, the President's Budget or FY 2014, once again submits an unrealistic proposal to address crowding with a miniscule budget offset of "$41 million for a proposed legislative initiative, which, if passed, would allow additional Good Conduct Time credit for inmates."  This is the same proposal to increase Good Conduct Time credit by a mere seven (7) days a year, that Congress turned down in the President's Budget's for FY2012 and FY2013, as "unrealistic," meaning that a seven day increase as a $41 million dollar offset, does little to safely reduce the growth of the federal prison population. BARBER, on the other hand, is a truly realistic legislative reform, installing a system wide "Relief Valve" and as a $1.2 billion dollar annual austerity sentencing bill.

FedCURE is calling on the President and Members of Congress to enact the BARBER AMENDMENT ~ a proposed bill to increase federal good time allowances ~ to safely reduce the federal prison population by at least 10%, with out disrupting release or reentry processes and public safety, at a cost saving's of $1.2 billion dollars annually. These savings on incarceration can be redirected (within in the bureau's budget) to reentry.  http://www.fedcure.org/documents/HR1475.shtml.

Since inmates "earned" the right to be in prison, why can't they also "earn" the right of release and reentry?

The BARBER AMENDMENT would greatly contribute to the healing of our economy and the healing of our nation. There are almost 219,000 people incarcerated in federal prison today and the majority of these are first time non violent offenders, whom under current Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Probation Office procedures, can be safely released via increased good time allowances, with no disruption to release and reentry processes and public safety

Accordingly, I urge you, in the most strongest terms, to please support The BARBER AMENDMENT.

Sincerely Yours,

Signed by: _____________________

Note: Send your message to your Congressperson(s) and Chairpersons, Honorable Bob Goodlatte and Honorable Charles E. Grassley. Click Contact Congress button and see contact information below.

---

Be Relentless:

•  Keep calling until your Congressperson(s) agree to sponsor the BARBER AMENDMENT, make an appointment to see them, if  necessary to get their support.